Construct 3 game performance software#
Construct 3 game performance Pc#
Construct 3 game performance license#
Construct 3 game performance professional#

Even though there is loads of overall users there doesn't seem to be that many people who would encourage others to use Construct 3.

Construct 3 game performance software#

I think the biggest take here is that the developers of the software are doing alright financially right now, though what I would suggest is running some kind of campaign/promotion, to get the engine in the hands of more developers who would in turn promote the use of the software.

But there are other options like Unity/Godot/UE4 which are free (at least for beginners and small teams) and so the barrier of entry is smaller and they get a lot more attention/traffic in industry, and so get much more tutorial and promotional content and media coverage.

Construct 3 game performance license#

And no I am not suggesting C3 be free, I am happy to support the developers with my personal license while I have an income/am alive/the product exists. but at this time I find the options not feasible as a Construct user.Д¬ons:В Most of the things I bring up here are really small in my opinion in comparison to the Pros.

Construct 3 game performance Pc#

I would love to develop games for browser for PC like a nice RPG that would be browser based. Or perhaps working closely with a strong platform like Kongregate. Web while not having it's own challenges would still open up a lot of new genres and possibilities. Mobile is super saturated and finding success in it gets harder and harder. There are ways, but they are very much 'you figure it out' solutions that as a non-programmer pretty much make it a non starter. I would also like to really see a concrete solution from Construct to make it easier for HTML5 web games to be monetized. Even if it were light 3D stuff at first like making a game like crossy roads. HTML5 can be used to produce hi quality 3D games with other tech using the same core javascript language. While I know 3D introduces new complexities, I'm not convinced I see how adding a Z axis and a 3d view would not still work with the same core logic and rules of Construct. I wish they would make inroads to 3D game development. A programming language simply offers more flexibility than something like Construct 3 ever could.Д¬ons:В I honestly can't think of any Cons about the software as is, however I do have two points that I believe Construct could do better in and would make the platform even more powerful, populare and profitable for their users:

Construct 3 game performance professional#

Your games will be more professional and will be optimised and will run better. If you wish to make good games fo yourself a favour and learn to program in a proper language. Using a proper programming language makes you realise how limited Construct 3 really is. I began coding in Swift instead and have since shipped two apps written in Swift. This really left a bad taste in my mouth.ДЄs a result of Scirra's inability to offer an appropriate level of support to their subscribers I ended my subscription. For such an important element that impacts on users ability to make money from Construct 3 you would think they would have given priority to fixing it. An issue was raised on github do that it could be fixed. The issue affected numerous other developers, not just me. I complained about the issue on Scirra's forums. This issue was potentially costing me money. I am an app developer and I was alerted by a user to an issue with one of my apps that resulted from a broken IAP component in Construct 3. The downside to this is that they don't prioritise fixing issues when they arise. Scirra are focused on introducing new features to Construct 3 constantly so users see the value of what is a rather pricey subscription. Cons:В Construct 3 suffers from a lack of support.